From: Ulrich Herfort/esoc/ESA 19/04/2006 15:06 To: Mathias Lauer/esoc/ESA@ESA Subject: VEX HGA1 calibration The following plots show the path of the G/S relative to the nominal and the calibrated boresight (HGA1XANG.JPG for X-band, HGA1SANG.JPG for S-band): The signal strength over time (as recorded in the IFMS AGC data files and scaled by distance) is shown here (HGA1XAGC.JPG and HGA1SAGC.JPG): The oscillations in the curves is a signature of the offset of the actual boresight w.r.t. the nominal one. Based on a least squares fit, the best estimate for the actual boresight is off from the nominal one (as contained in the FDDB) by: X-Band S-Band total separation angle: 0.15 deg 0.32 deg offset towards S/C y axis: -0.14 deg -0.32 deg offset towards S/C z axis: 0.04 deg 0.02 deg Relative signal strength over total depointing w.r.t. to both the nominal and the estimated actual boresight is shown in the last two plots (HGA1XCAL.JPG and HGA1SCAL.JPG). Also shown is a) the theoretical prediction based on the 3dB half cone angle of 0.96 (X-band) or 3.5 (S-band) deg which is contained in the FDDB, b) a biquadratic fit to the relative signal strength over total depointing w.r.t. the estimated actual boresight (a quadratic fit was not sufficient, see below). In both cases the signal strength decreases considerably faster with increasing depointing than predicted. This is due to the 4th order term, which gives a non-negligible contribution compared to the quadratic term even for an depointing equal to the 3 dB halfcone angle. In case of X-band, even the quadratic term alone gives a lower 3 dB halfcone angle than predicted, as can be seen from the following table: 3 dB halfcone angle X-Band S-Band with 4th order term 0.86 deg 3.3 deg quadratic term only 0.91 deg 3.5 deg nominal 0.96 deg 3.5 deg -- Ulrich Herfort EDS Operations Services GmbH ESOC Flight Dynamics Support, OPS-GFI European Space Operations Centre Robert Bosch Strasse 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany Tel. +49-6151-90-2132 Fax: +49-6151-90-2271